What is a red team?
Think of your organization's cybersecurity as a fortress. You've built strong walls, deployed guards, and installed surveillance systems, but have you truly tested them? That's where understanding what is red teaming comes in. A red team is a group of skilled cybersecurity experts who simulate real-world cyberattacks on your systems, networks, and applications to uncover vulnerabilities and test your response. This is not your typical penetration test; it's a rigorous, thorough examination of your entire security setup, which is why security leaders must understand what is red teaming.
Red teaming is about finding and exploiting weaknesses to determine how prepared your organization is against actual cyberthreats. Unlike traditional penetration tests, red teams adopt the mindset of real-world adversaries, employing a combination of technical exploits and social engineering to challenge your defenses. This holistic approach aims to emulate the tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) of real threat actors.
Why does red teaming matter?
Red teaming is crucial if you want to stay ahead of cyberthreats. It offers a way to stress-test your security in a controlled environment, allowing you to identify hidden gaps and test your response to various attack vectors. It's like a fire drill for your cybersecurity, helping you uncover vulnerabilities before cybercriminals do.
These exercises, also called assessments or engagements, aren't just about technical exploits; they also include social engineering, which tests your staff's security awareness and compliance with security policies. Red team engagements can even extend to physical security, assessing your physical access controls and surveillance systems.
What are the benefits of red teaming?
Red teaming has several key benefits, each contributing to a stronger cybersecurity posture.
Real-World simulation: Red team exercises mimic actual cyberattacks and the TTP of threat actors, providing a realistic view of how attackers may target you. By adopting an adversarial mindset, red teams can identify vulnerabilities and weaknesses that traditional security assessments could miss.
Holistic assessment: Unlike penetration testing, which focuses on specific vulnerabilities, red teaming takes a broader approach. It evaluates your entire security posture, from technology and processes to people and physical security. This comprehensive view helps you identify systemic weaknesses and prioritize areas for improvement.
Incident response testing: Red teaming allows you to test your incident response capabilities in a controlled setting. If your team struggles to detect or respond to a simulated attack, it's better to find out now than during a real incident. This process helps refine your response strategies and improve your incident response plan.
Enhanced security awareness: Social engineering tactics, like phishing campaigns, pretexting, and baiting, test employee awareness and adherence to security best practices. These exercises can help raise awareness among your staff and demonstrate the importance of cybersecurity in day-to-day operations.
Risk prioritization: Red team exercises simulate sophisticated attacks to identify your most critical security risks, providing a clear view of your vulnerabilities. This allows you to prioritize cybersecurity resources effectively, ensuring you focus on the areas that need the most attention to reduce the likelihood of successful cyberattacks.
Continuous improvement: Red teaming fosters a culture of continuous improvement. By conducting regular exercises, you can refine your security strategies and stay ahead of emerging threats. It's an opportunity to learn, adapt, and evolve, ensuring that your defenses remain strong over time.
What is red teaming versus penetration testing?
While red teaming and penetration testing are both valuable tools for assessing cybersecurity, they have different goals and methodologies. Penetration testing is more targeted, focusing on specific vulnerabilities within your systems, applications, or network infrastructure. Penetration testers follow a predefined scope and methodology to identify and exploit vulnerabilities, often using automated tools and manual techniques.
Red teaming, on the other hand, takes a broader approach, emulating a sophisticated cyber adversary to assess your overall security. It involves advanced techniques, like social engineering, lateral movement, and even physical security breaches, to evaluate your resilience against complex threats. The goal is to challenge your entire security operation, not just individual components.
Some of the key differences between red teaming and penetration testing include:
- Scope: Red teaming covers a wider scope, aiming to assess your overall security resilience. Penetration testing is more focused, targeting specific vulnerabilities within a defined scope.
- Methodology: Red teams use a variety of techniques, including reconnaissance, infiltration, privilege escalation, and exfiltration, to simulate realistic cyberattacks. Penetration testing follows a structured approach, often relying on automated tools to identify and exploit vulnerabilities.
- Objectives: Red teams aim to mimic realistic tactics, uncovering systemic weaknesses that typical security assessments may overlook. Penetration testing focuses on evaluating specific security controls and validating your defenses against known vulnerabilities.
What is the red teaming process?
Red teaming is a detailed process that begins with setting clear objectives and defining the scope of the engagement. This involves identifying key stakeholders and establishing the rules of engagement, ensuring everyone is on the same page. Once the scope is defined, the red team starts with reconnaissance, gathering information about your organization, infrastructure, and personnel. They may use open-source intelligence (OSINT), social engineering, and other techniques to identify potential attack vectors.
After the reconnaissance phase, the red team develops a comprehensive attack plan. This plan outlines the tactics, techniques, and procedures they will use to simulate a cyberattack. It may include phishing campaigns, technical exploits, and physical security assessments, tailored to the specific objectives of the engagement.
When the attack plan is in place, the red team executes the simulated attacks. This could involve sending phishing emails to your employees, exploiting vulnerabilities in network infrastructure, or attempting to gain unauthorized access to sensitive systems and data. Throughout the engagement, the red team maintains communication with your stakeholders, providing updates on their progress and findings.
Once the red team completes their assessment, they compile a detailed report outlining their findings, including identified vulnerabilities, successful attack vectors, and recommendations for improvement. This report is presented to key stakeholders, helping you prioritize remediation efforts and improve your overall cybersecurity.
What are the differences between a red team, a blue team, and a purple team?
Red, blue, and purple teams each have unique roles in cybersecurity, but together, they form a more informed security strategy by sharing insights and collaborating to identify and mitigate threats.
Key differences between a red, blue, and purple team include:
- Red teams: Red teams are the offensive experts who simulate real-world cyberattacks to test your defenses. They focus on finding vulnerabilities and weaknesses, using tactics that real adversaries would deploy. Their goal is to challenge your security posture and provide valuable insights into where your defenses need strengthening.
- Blue teams: Blue teams are the defenders. They are responsible for protecting your systems and networks, detecting threats, and responding to security incidents. They maintain and implement security controls, using tools like Security Information and Event Management (SIEM), Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS), and Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) to monitor your environment in real time. Blue teams are on the front lines, working to keep cyberthreats at bay.
- Purple teams: Purple teams bridge the gap between red and blue teams. Instead of working in opposition, they combine offensive and defensive expertise. In purple team exercises, red and blue teams collaborate, sharing tactics, techniques, and insights to improve security effectiveness. These exercises typically involve coordinated efforts to simulate attacks, evaluate defensive responses, and identify potential improvements, leading to a more cohesive and effective cybersecurity strategy.
How do you build a successful red team?
Building a successful red team starts with finding the right talent. Look for cybersecurity professionals who bring a diverse set of skills, including offensive security, penetration testing, threat intelligence, and incident response. These experts should have experience with real-world security assessments and a deep understanding of how cyber adversaries operate. A solid background in offensive security tools and techniques, like Metasploit, Cobalt Strike, and custom malware development, is crucial for simulating sophisticated cyberattacks.
Social engineering expertise is another essential skill for red team members. This involves crafting convincing phishing campaigns, pretexting scenarios, and other methods of manipulating individuals to gain unauthorized access to sensitive information. A background in psychology or behavioral science can be valuable for understanding human behavior and creating effective social engineering strategies.
Collaboration and communication skills are key for red team exercises, especially when working with blue and purple teams. Effective red team members must be able to share insights, coordinate with others, and work together to improve security posture. This is particularly important in purple team exercises, where red and blue teams collaborate to simulate attacks and refine defensive strategies.
Successful red team members should be adaptable and committed to continuous learning. The cybersecurity landscape is always changing, and red teams need to stay ahead of emerging threats. A willingness to experiment with new techniques and adapt to different environments helps you ensure that red team exercises remain effective and relevant.
What tools and techniques do red teams frequently use?
Red teams use a variety of tools and techniques to simulate realistic cyberattacks. These tools are designed to mimic the TTPs used by real-world threat actors, allowing red teams to identify vulnerabilities and assess your security posture. Here are some common tools and techniques used in red teaming.
Penetration testing tools: Red teams use a range of penetration testing tools to identify and exploit vulnerabilities in networks, applications, and systems. Popular tools include network scanners, vulnerability scanners, exploit frameworks, and password-cracking tools.
Social engineering: Red teams employ social engineering techniques, like phishing emails, pretexting, and baiting, to manipulate individuals into revealing sensitive information or performing actions that compromise security. This helps assess your security awareness training and policies.
Custom malware: Red teams may develop or use custom malware to simulate advanced cyberattacks and evade detection. These malware samples mimic the behavior of realistic threats, testing your ability to detect and respond to sophisticated attacks.
Exploitation frameworks: Frameworks like Metasploit and Cobalt Strike allow red teams to automate the process of identifying and exploiting vulnerabilities. These tools offer a range of pre-built exploits and post-exploitation capabilities, enabling comprehensive assessments.
Physical security testing: Red teams may also conduct physical penetration testing, including lock picking, tailgating, and other techniques to assess physical security. This helps identify weaknesses in physical access controls and surveillance systems.
Adversarial tactics simulation: Red teams simulate the behavior of advanced threat actors, allowing you to test your defenses against realistic attacks. This approach provides insights into emerging threats and vulnerabilities that might not be detected through usual security measures.
When does a red team assessment make sense?
Security budgets are often limited, so you need to know when a red team assessment makes sense. If your security posture is in its early stages, red teaming might not be the best first step. Instead, focus on traditional penetration testing to identify and address basic vulnerabilities. As your security matures, red teaming can provide more value by offering a comprehensive assessment of your overall resilience.
Consider the following when deciding whether to conduct a red team assessment:
-
Security maturity: If your organization is still developing its security posture, focus on fixing known vulnerabilities before conducting a red team assessment. As you address these issues, red teaming can provide deeper insights.
- Industry-Specific threats: If your industry faces specific threats, like ransomware attacks in healthcare, red teaming can help you assess your readiness against those threats. It's a proactive approach to ensuring you're prepared for emerging risks.
- Budget and resources: Red teaming can be resource-intensive, so consider your budget and personnel availability. Ensure you have the necessary resources to support the assessment and address the findings.
- Frequency of testing: While annual red team exercises are suitable for many organizations, those in high-risk environments might need more frequent testing. Evaluate your risk profile to determine the appropriate frequency for red team assessments.
What questions should you ask before conducting a red team assessment?
Before you jump into a red team assessment, it's essential to ask the right questions to ensure you're prepared. Here are some questions to consider.
- What are our specific objectives for the red team assessment?
- How do we define the scope of the assessment to ensure it aligns with our goals?
- What are the most likely threat scenarios we should prioritize during the assessment?
- How can we establish realistic and measurable goals to gauge the effectiveness of our security defenses?
- Who are the key stakeholders to involve in the planning process, and how do we ensure their buy-in?
- What is our tolerance for risk and disruption, and how does it influence our approach to the assessment?
- What rules of engagement should we establish to guide the conduct of the red team assessment?
- Do we have the resources—like time, budget, and personnel—to support the assessment effectively?
- Do we have a comprehensive incident response plan to address any findings or incidents uncovered during the assessment?
- How can we leverage the insights gained from the assessment to continuously improve our security posture and resilience against cyberthreats?
These questions can help you set clear objectives, establish scope, and ensure that you are ready to take full advantage of the red team engagement.
Strengthen your security posture with red teaming
Red teaming is a powerful tool for organizations looking to strengthen their cybersecurity posture. It provides a realistic view of your security defenses by simulating real-world cyberattacks, helping you uncover vulnerabilities, test your incident response, and enhance security awareness. To make the most of red teaming, set clear objectives, define a reasonable scope, and collaborate with key stakeholders. So, when an organization asks what is red teaming, it is important to remember that red teaming is part of a broader cybersecurity strategy—use the insights gained to drive continuous improvement and stay ahead of emerging threats.
Don't miss another article. Subscribe to our blog now.
Included Topics
Randy is the Special Operations Group (SOG) Manager at NuHarbor Security where he spearheads the team of Offensive Operators known as REDSEC. Randy spends most of his time working with the REDSEC team to ensure NuHarbor Security remains at the forefront of Adversary Emulation and strives to make cybersecurity easier for clients. Prior to joining NuHarbor Security, Randy spent 21 years in the US Army working in both defensive and offensive Cyber positions.