Related Posts
Subscribe via Email
Subscribe to our blog to get insights sent directly to your inbox.
When security compliance obligations land on your desk, it’s easy to feel like you’re drowning in acronyms and mandates: GLBA, NIST, FERPA, NY Education Law 2D. Although this can be an overwhelming list of terms, they aren’t just boxes to check, they are powerful levers that can transform your organization’s security posture and institutional trust. We work with many leaders in higher education and state or local governments that are re-engineering their organizations to be more compliance-focused and cyber resilient.
Let’s start with the latest version update of the Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act (GLBA), a seismic shift enacted in June 2023. Suddenly, every institution classified under Title IV is expected to formalize its security leadership, mandating things like an official CISO (or vCISO), annual risk assessments, encryption, penetration testing, multi-factor authentication (MFA), board oversight, and real-time board reporting. Following these guidelines isn’t optional; the Department of Education and FTC will sanction institutions that fall behind.
At the same time, educational institutions across the U.S. are accelerating their own cybersecurity mandates. Take New York’s Education Law 2d: it goes beyond student-data privacy, demanding comprehensive incident response protocols, transparent breach reporting, and documented governance. The compliance regulation is backed by state-level audits and demands for state-mandated disclosures. With these new regulations, simply doing cybersecurity is no longer enough. You need to demonstrate it clearly, both in documentation and in practice.
Now layer in FERPA, HIPAA, and NIST security requirements (particularly for institutions handling CUI (controlled unclassified information) or engaging in sensitive research). The result is a compliance web where institutions like research universities are trapped between requirements for student data privacy, health record protection, and maintaining their federal funding. While overlapping regulations may feel redundant, smart leaders recognize that using a unified security framework like NIST 800-53, can satisfy multiple mandates at once, reducing friction, and avoiding audit fatigue.
Here’s where security leadership vision and backing matters most. Yes, compliance is mandatory, but it also creates opportunities to build capability, decrease business risk and earn trust.
Here are 6 ways to turn regulatory obligations into security wins that actually move the needle:
Compliance is a method to build reputation, capital, and trust. It’s how parents, faculty, taxpayers, and legislators know your institution takes security seriously. Leaders who embrace this mindset don’t wait until disaster strikes, they strategize, educate, and evolve their programs to keep their populations safe and maintain trust:
Compliance is more than a requirement; it builds credibility and reinforces trust with your customers. That trust opens doors to leadership support and long-term investment in your organization’s security. Leverage that momentum to advance your security program, reduce risk, and strengthen your response capabilities.
Looking to leverage compliance regulations to strengthen your organization? Let’s talk.
Don't miss another article. Subscribe to our blog now.
Brianna Blanchard is the Senior Manager of Information Assurance and Advisory Services at NuHarbor Security where she leads a team of professionals. She has over 15 years of experience working in cybersecurity and information technology. Before joining NuHarbor Security, Brianna worked for government organizations helping them build their security compliance and governance programs from the ground up. Brianna currently is involved in co-leading the Women in Cybersecurity Council at Champlain College, with the goal of making cybersecurity more inclusive and Champlain College the best place for women in cyber.
Subscribe to our blog to get insights sent directly to your inbox.