Related Posts
Subscribe via Email
Subscribe to our blog to get insights sent directly to your inbox.
Important note: This blog was written on June 27, 2025. Threat intelligence and geopolitical circumstances may have evolved since publication.
As tensions escalate in the Middle East, particularly involving Iran, the U.S., and Israel, state and local government security teams are being urged by CISA, the FBI, and CIS to “go shields up.” Fortunately, this doesn't necessitate deploying new technologies; reinforcing fundamental cybersecurity practices remains the most effective defense.
Iranian-aligned cyber actors are not your typical ransomware groups. They are methodical, patient, and experienced in maintaining undetected access across long timelines. These adversaries have successfully targeted critical infrastructure, government networks, and service providers in past campaigns, using stealth over speed and persistence over noise.
They rely on well-rehearsed playbooks to establish footholds and move laterally, often without triggering alerts. The most valuable lesson: they succeed when identity controls fail.
Several advanced persistent threat groups operating on behalf of or aligned with the Iranian government are actively targeting U.S. systems:
These groups focus on critical systems like programmable logic controllers and public sector infrastructure. They rely on credential-based access, not advanced zero-days, and show particular interest in environments using Israeli-manufactured equipment, often driven by geopolitical motives.
These threat groups are not breaking down the door, they are logging in. Their preferred method is credential harvesting and brute force login attempts targeting Microsoft 365, VPNs, and on-prem Windows environments.
While these actors often prefer credential-based access, several Iranian APTs—including APT35—have quickly exploited high-profile vulnerabilities like Log4Shell and ProxyShell. This dual approach makes layered defenses essential.
The emphasis on identity gives defenders a critical advantage: if you can harden access and reduce exposed credentials, you significantly reduce their ability to operate.
These are the same tactical moves we’re recommending across state and local government environments today. They don’t require a new stack, just focused attention on the right pressure points:
Nation-state attackers do not need malware when they can log in. If your credentials are exposed, your identity perimeter becomes the attack surface. That includes your access policies, login protections, and monitoring. This is your true first line of defense.
Locking down identity does more than reduce risk. It forces attackers to work harder, and when they work harder, they make mistakes. That is when you detect them and that is how you win.
If you're assessing your readiness or need help identifying exposed identity assets or gaps in segmentation, NuHarbor can help. From advisory to hands-on validation, our team supports security programs with pragmatic, expert-led strategies.
Don't miss another article. Subscribe to our blog now.
Kyle Smith is the Vice President of Product Management at NuHarbor Security. He leads the development and execution of strategic product initiatives, ensuring that NuHarbor’s solutions are aligned with the evolving needs of both public and private sector organizations. During his two decades in the cybersecurity industry, Kyle has held leadership roles across multiple domains, including security operations, network architecture, and product innovation. Before joining NuHarbor, he led cross-domain technology teams, spearheading security and systems initiatives to protect organizations from advanced threats. Kyle's experience as an IT technologist, security operator, and client advocate has combined to make him an empathetic and practical leader as NuHarbor develops and delivers new, valuable capabilities to our clients.
Subscribe to our blog to get insights sent directly to your inbox.